▶ Demo RFP feed. These RFPs are fabricated to show how the inbound feed looks for "Acme AI" vendors. ← Back to demo dashboard
Vendor Inbound RFPs · Live Demo
Anonymous buyers in your category
4 active RFPs in AI Coding & Developer Tools matching Acme AI's profile. You can pitch them — they decide if and when to reveal their identity. (In production, you'd see RFPs from your actual category and respond directly through the dashboard.)
Replacing GitHub Copilot for a 45-engineer Series B startup
We're a B2B SaaS company (45 engineers, mostly Python and TypeScript) currently on GitHub Copilot Business. Productivity gains have plateaued and our engineering leadership wants to evaluate alternatives that handle multi-file refactors and codebase-wide reasoning better. Looking to make a decision in the next 30 days.
Company size
Medium (50 engineers)
Industry
SaaS
Budget
$30K - $80K/year
Timeline
Decision within 30 days
Must-haves
✓ Multi-file refactor support✓ Works in our existing IDEs (VS Code + JetBrains)✓ SSO + audit logs (SOC 2 compliance)✓ Reasonable per-seat pricing at 50 seats
Series A AI startup, 8 engineers, evaluating AI dev tooling from scratch
We're greenfield — no existing AI dev tools. CTO wants to standardize on one platform across the team before we hit 20 engineers. Strong preference for tools with transparent pricing and a real free/trial tier so individual engineers can test before commit.
Company size
Small (8 engineers)
Industry
AI/ML
Budget
$5K - $20K/year
Timeline
Decision within 60 days
Must-haves
✓ Free tier or genuine trial✓ Transparent per-seat pricing✓ Active community / discord✓ Doesn't lock us into one IDE
We're a healthcare technology platform with HIPAA + HITRUST requirements. Need an AI coding assistant where customer-derived code/data NEVER leaves a controlled environment. On-prem deployment or single-tenant SaaS only. BAA required.
Company size
Large (120 engineers)
Industry
Healthcare
Budget
$100K - $300K/year
Timeline
Decision in Q3 2026
Must-haves
✓ HIPAA + HITRUST compliant✓ BAA signed✓ On-prem or single-tenant deployment✓ Audit log export for compliance team✓ Data residency in US
Mid-market FinServ, 200 engineers — evaluating Cursor for Business vs alternatives
Currently running an unmanaged mix of Copilot, Cursor, and Tabnine across teams. Procurement is pushing for consolidation onto a single vendor with enterprise SSO/admin controls. We want to evaluate Cursor for Business head-to-head against Copilot Enterprise, with a 90-day pilot for 30 engineers before committing.
Company size
Large (200 engineers)
Industry
Financial Services
Budget
$200K+/year
Timeline
90-day pilot, then full rollout
Must-haves
✓ Enterprise SSO (Okta)✓ Admin dashboard with usage analytics✓ Pilot program (30 seats, 90 days)✓ Reference customers in regulated industries✓ SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001
Also evaluating
Cursor for BusinessGitHub Copilot EnterpriseSourcegraph Cody
ⓘ Every RFP on this page is fabricated. The structure (anonymous buyer, structured must-haves, competitive context, time-bound responses) is exactly how the real RFP feed works. In production, you'd see RFPs filtered to your category, click "Respond" to send a pitch, and the buyer decides whether to reveal their identity and engage further.