Ops/marketing teams hitting Zapier task limits, anyone needing branching logic or iteration, agencies running automation for clients.
Engineering teams wanting code-first workflows (use n8n or Temporal), or anyone needing genuinely durable workflow execution at high volume.
What is Make.com?
Make (formerly Integromat) is a visual workflow automation platform with 2,000+ integrations and a node-based canvas that handles branching, error routing, and iteration far better than Zapier. Czech-founded, acquired by Celonis in 2020, Make has carved out the "power user" segment of iPaaS — teams that outgrow Zapier's task pricing but aren't ready for code-first orchestrators like n8n or Temporal.
Key features
Integrations
What people actually pay
No price data yet — be the first to share
No price data yet for Make.com. Help the community — share what you pay (anonymized).
Zapier's smarter, cheaper sibling
Make.com gives you 3-10x more automation per dollar than Zapier at any meaningful volume, with better support for branching, iteration, and error handling. The right pick for ops teams who've outgrown Zapier's pricing.
Make's operations-based pricing model is the headline feature: a Zap that fires once might consume one task in Zapier and three operations in Make, but Make's base tier includes 10,000 operations for $9/mo where Zapier's $20 starter gives you 750 tasks. At any meaningful automation volume, Make is materially cheaper. The visual scenario builder also handles branching, iteration, and error routing more naturally than Zapier's linear path model — which matters once your automations become real workflows.
The weaknesses are real. The integration catalog is smaller than Zapier's (around 2,000 versus 7,000+), so the long tail of niche SaaS may not be covered. The visual builder, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve — non-technical users sometimes find Zapier's simpler model more approachable. And Make's newer AI features (Make AI agent, OpenAI/Anthropic modules) are catching up to Zapier Central but feel less polished.
Buy Make if your team's automations have outgrown Zapier's task pricing or your workflows need branching/iteration. Stay with Zapier if you're a non-technical solo user, your volume is genuinely low, or the specific integrations you need aren't in Make's catalog. Consider n8n if you have any engineering capacity and want self-hosting or code-level extensibility.
Operations and marketing teams running medium-to-high-volume automations who've outgrown Zapier's task-based pricing.
Non-technical solo users with low automation volume, or teams needing the long tail of integrations only Zapier covers.
Written by StackMatch Editorial. StackMatch editorial reviews are independent analyst commentary, not user reviews. We have no affiliate relationship with this tool. See user reviews below for community perspective.
What Make.com actually costs
Sticker price isn't the real cost. We add implementation, training, and a probability-weighted lock-in penalty.
When to negotiate Make.com
Vendor sales pressure is non-uniform — quarter-close, year-end, and post-funding-round are your high-leverage windows.
Strong negotiation window. Reps will push for end-of-quarter signature. Don't move first — let them initiate the discount. Target 15-30% off list plus negotiated terms.
Take this to your sales call
10 questions vendor sales teams steer around — generated from Make.com's pricing tier, lock-in profile, and editorial verdict.
- 1PRICINGMake.com is starter-tier on the public site. What's the discount path for solo-sized teams committing annually vs. monthly?
- 2PRICINGWhat overages or seat-overflow charges should we plan for? Show me the worst-case bill if our usage grows 2x in year 1.
- 3CONTRACTAuto-renewal: how many days notice is required to terminate, and what happens if we miss the window? Will you commit to a renewal-reminder email at 90 and 60 days?
- 4MIGRATIONData export: what's the complete spec — format, frequency, and what data does the export NOT include? After contract end, how long do we have read-only access?
- 5MIGRATIONImplementation runs days. Who from your team is included by default, and who do we add at additional cost? Is a CSM assigned?
- 6FITMake.com is best for: Operations and marketing teams running medium-to-high-volume automations who've outgrown Zapier's task-based pricing.. We're [describe your situation]. Walk me through the failure modes if our profile doesn't match.
- 7FITConnect us with 2-3 reference customers at our company size in SaaS — not the case-study list, customers who've been live for 18+ months and have churned at least one tool from your stack.
- 8INTEGRATIONMake.com lists 5 integrations including Slack, OpenAI, Anthropic. Which of OUR existing tools — bring our list — have you confirmed shipping integration with versus "on roadmap"? Show me the actual status.
- 9VENDORTrack record over the last 18 months: any pricing model changes, executive departures, layoffs, M&A activity, or material customer churn we should know about?
- 10VENDORIf you're acquired or shut down, what's the contractual continuity — source-code escrow, data portability, transition period? Show me the actual clause.
What to actually test in the demo
Vendor sales teams script demos to maximize close rate. Here's what they'd rather you not test — derived from Make.com's lock-in profile and editorial verdict.
- 1PERFORMANCEBring YOUR data, not their demo data. Insist on running the demo workflow against a sample of your real records, files, or queries. If they refuse — that's a signal.
- 2PERFORMANCEMake.com demo will be built around the happy path. Ask: "Show me what happens when [the most common failure mode in our context]" — make them improvise.
- 3EDGE CASESPush the limits live: largest dataset, longest workflow, most users concurrent. Vendors prep demos for medium loads — your real-world usage might 10x what they show.
- 4EDGE CASESMobile and offline behavior: how does Make.com degrade on slow connections, on iPad, in airplane mode? Test in the demo if your team uses these surfaces.
- 5PRICINGFind the upgrade triggers. Which features force a paid plan? Which usage limits trigger overage? Get the rep to demo your team hitting each cap.
- 6INTEGRATIONVendors love their integration logo wall. Test the actual depth: pick the 2-3 (Slack, OpenAI-style) integrations you depend on most, and ask the rep to demo a real two-way data sync, not a marketing screenshot.
- 7INTEGRATIONAPI and webhook reality check: rate limits, payload size limits, retry behavior, auth refresh handling. Ask for actual API docs in the demo, not "we'll send those."
- 8MIGRATIONDemo the full data export workflow. Even with low lock-in, you want to see how clean the exit looks before signing.
- 9SUPPORTSubmit a real support ticket DURING the demo. Use the actual support channel customers use, not the rep's email. Time the response. This is your most honest data point about post-sale reality.
- 10SUPPORTAsk to be connected with a customer in the demo who you can email TODAY (not "we'll arrange a reference call next week"). The vendor's confidence in their references is a tell.
User Reviews
Be the first to review this tool