n8n vs Make (Integromat)
An honest, context-aware comparison. No affiliate links. No paid placements. Just the data that helps you decide.
n8n
Open-source workflow automation — self-hosted Zapier alternative with 400+ integrations and code support.
Make (Integromat)
Visual workflow automation — the most powerful no-code integration platform with 1000+ app connectors.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Objective metrics, no spin.
Technical teams running high-volume automations where Zapier costs would be prohibitive. Also ideal for data-sensitive workflows that cannot go through third-party servers.
Non-technical teams — Zapier or Make are far easier. n8n requires some technical setup.
Teams needing more powerful automation than Zapier at a lower price. Make handles complex multi-step workflows with data manipulation that Zapier struggles with.
Very non-technical teams — Make has a steeper learning curve. Zapier is simpler for basic automations.
Shared Integrations (3)
Both tools connect to these — you won't lose workflow continuity whichever you pick.
Both suited for: small, medium, large companies
Since both tools target small and medium and large companies, your decision should hinge on the specific use case above rather than company fit. Try the AI Advisor to get a recommendation tailored to your exact stack.
Still not sure? Describe your situation.
The AI advisor knows both tools and your full stack. Tell it your company size, current tools, and what's not working — it'll tell you which one actually fits.
Other API & Integration Platforms Tools to Consider
If neither is the right fit, these are the next best alternatives in the same category.